CSA Safety Measurement System Better Than SafeStat

As of December 4, 2015, pursuant to the FAST Act of 2015 being signed into law, the FMCSA removed BASIC scores from public view on its website. The CSA program is not going away, but BASIC scores will remain unavailable to the public until the FMCSA can implement a corrective action plan.

The majority of CSA information related to property carrier compliance and safety performance will no longer be displayed publicly on the FMCSA SMS Website.

CSA Safety Measurement System Better Than SafeStat

by Tom McCorry

It was December 19, 2010 that the FMCSA released its new Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) Program and BASIC scores. It replaced the SafeStat system for rating carriers and provides a new and improved way to measure carrier safety and compliance. About eight months later, on August 31, 2011 the FMCSA published findings of an independent evaluation of the CSA operational model conducted by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI). The following information was provided by the FMCSA.

UMTRI's findings confirm that CSA substantially improves FMCSA's enforcement and compliance model. The results confirm that the CSA model enables FMCSA and its State Partners to contact more commercial motor carriers earlier to correct safety problems and ensure compliance with safety regulations in order to reduce crashes, injuries and fatalities related to commercial motor vehicles.

Launched in 2008, the CSA Op-Model Test divided motor carriers from four test states (Colorado, Georgia, Missouri, and New Jersey) between test and control groups. UMTRI evaluated the effectiveness of the new Safety Measurement System (SMS) and CSA interventions, and compared the cost and efficiency of the CSA compliance and enforcement model to the previous model. They found effectiveness and efficiency gains that fully support the ongoing national implementation of CSA, as outlined below. FMCSA added additional states, Delaware, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, and Montana, to the test to demonstrate full implementation challenges and to provide a validation dataset for evaluation purposes.

CSA’s SMS Better Identifies Motor Carriers for Safety Interventions Than The Previous SafeStat System

  • • "The results showed that the SMS is a significant improvement over the SafeStat system in identifying unsafe carriers. (p. xiv)"
  • • Crash rates were higher for motor carriers identified with safety problems in the SMS's seven Behavior Analysis and Safety Improvement Categories (BASICs) than for motor carriers that were not identified with safety problems in the seven BASICs.
  • • The crash rate for motor carriers that were identified with safety problems by the SMS in the Unsafe Driving BASIC was more than three times greater than the crash rate for motor carriers not identified with any safety problems by SMS.

CSA Interventions Are Effective In Improving Motor Carriers' Safety Behavior

  • • "The effect of the warning letter intervention is likely one of the most significant findings in this evaluation. (p. xviii)" Twelve months after receiving a warning letter, SMS results showed that 83% of test carriers had resolved identified safety problems and only 17% continued to have safety problems.
  • • The new CSA Onsite Focused Investigations proved to be effective. Almost 20% fewer motor carriers continued to show safety problems 12 months after an on-site focused investigation, as compared with those receiving traditional Compliance Reviews (CRs).

CSA Interventions Use Enforcement Resources Efficiently

  • • More intensive interventions were used on carriers that exhibited higher crash risk confirming that the rules guiding intervention selection are operating to ensure effective and efficient safety interventions.
  • • Warning letters, which were found to be very effective in improving safety behavior, had only a nominal cost.
  • • CSA Onsite Focused Investigations cost approximately 53 percent less than CRs and were effective in producing compliance.
  • • The average cost of CSA interventions was $754 per motor carrier, as compared to $1438 for motor carriers receiving CRs.

CSA Reaches More Carriers to Improve Safety Compliance

  • • CSA interventions contact approximately three times the number of motor carriers contacted using the previous model which relied primarily on CRs.
  • • Among the CSA test group, the annual percentage of motor carriers contacted was 9.9 percent, compared with the 3.2 percent of motor carriers that received full CRs in 2009.

The evaluator identified some areas that require improvement and FMCSA is firmly committed to a continuous improvement process for this very important program.

SMS's BASICs Are Significantly Related to Underlying Motor Carrier Safety, Although The Cargo-Related and Driver Fitness BASICs Show A Weaker Relationship to Crash Risk

  • • The evaluator’s findings are in line with FMCSA’s effectiveness findings; as a result, at the end of the Op-Model Test FMCSA adjusted how it identifies motor carriers for intervention to ensure BASICs with the strongest relationship to future crashes receive the most emphasis. However, FMCSA continues to address motor carriers with patterns of noncompliance in the Cargo-Related and Driver Fitness BASICs, which include carrier requirements for being properly licensed, carrying medical cards to allow verification that a driver meets the medical qualification standards, adequately securing cargo, and properly packaging and handling hazardous materials.
  • • As part of its ongoing commitment to continually assess and improve the SMS, FMCSA has a study underway that may result in improvements to some BASICs, with particular effect on the Cargo-Related BASIC.

There Was Lag Time in Measureable Safety Performance Improvement after CSA Investigations, And for Carriers with The Most Serious Safety Problems, Improvement Rates Were Similar to The Control Group

  • • FMCSA expects the upcoming Safety Fitness Determination rulemaking to accelerate return to compliance or removal from service for motor carriers with the worst safety problems.
  • • Based on lessons learned in the Op-Model Test, FMCSA improved the CSA investigative process and training in the Safety Management Cycle for its Federal and State Partner investigators. The enhanced investigative process allows investigators to systematically identify motor carriers’ safety problems and to recommend remedies to help carriers to quickly become safer.

View Complete Report conducted by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

Try Carrier411 for Free

Carrier411 can help protect your company from using unqualified, non-compliant and unsafe carriers. Get started today with our Risk-Free Trial Account and use Carrier411 free for 30 days to qualify and monitor your carriers for insurance, authority and safety.

Featured Articles

CSA Safety Measurement System Better Than SafeStat to Identify Unsafe Carriers
by Tom McCorry

Hiring Carriers With Due Diligence
by William J. Augello, Esq.

Protecting Against Negligent Hiring of Carriers
by Ronald H. Usem, Esq.

Looking Beyond Satisfactory Safety Ratings
by Darren Brewer

Analyzing Safety Ratings and SafeStat Scores
by Darren Brewer

Co Brokering vs. Double Brokering
by Giles Roch, CTB

Double Brokered or Double Crossed
by William J. Augello, Esq.

The Illusion of a Certificate of Insurance
by William J. Augello, Esq.

Special "Book Combo Offer" Available

Order All Three Books by Bill Augello and save 15%. Also available on CD-ROM.